The world is awash with claims that companies are ‘net zero’ aligned – but what does it really mean? Behind most corporate net zero claims are different standards and guidelines. Some of the most widely used are about to be updated—and we want them to be improved. Read our factsheet to find out how.
More than 80 leading civil society organisations, including ECOS, have issued a joint statement rejecting the use of carbon offsets to meet corporate climate targets. We call on accounting bodies like the Science-Based Targets Initiative (SBTi) and the Greenhouse Gas Protocol to continue excluding offsets and stick to scientifically-sound methodologies for tracking corporate climate efforts.
The steel sector is the most carbon-intensive in the world, responsible for 7% of energy-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. To decarbonise, individual companies need to commit to climate targets – and these need to be ambitious enough. The Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi) recently updated its guidelines and targets for the steel sector, which now has a much stronger foundation for lowering emissions – but improvements must not stop there.
The gold standard for climate targets, SBTi, falls short. It does not follow the latest science or UN recommendations on net zero. Together with 20+ NGOs, ECOS has urged SBTi to align with UN standards. Read the joint letter.
ECOS is co-funded by the European Commission and EFTA
Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or EISMEA. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.