Civil society organisations are renewing their long-standing call for Europe to put in place laws that will protect the public and the environment from potential harm from nanomaterials.
After years of discussions, the EU has still not agreed rules that will properly regulate nanomaterials. In a position paper presented on Wednesday 7 December in Brussels, NGOs call for a regulation that will force companies provide safety information on nanomaterials before they enter the market.
The organisations want nanomaterials to be addressed in specific legislation rather than in the annexes of the EU chemicals legislation REACH, as suggested by the EU authorities. REACH is not fit-for-purpose to manage these substances as it does not set down a definition for nanomaterials, or thresholds for high tonnage chemicals. These failings make it very difficult to address the information gaps for most nanomaterials on the market. Signatories of the position paper also want mandatory ingredient labelling for consumer products, publicly available market data and harmonised definitions for nanomaterials.
Doreen Fedrigo-Fazio, ECOS Senior Policy Officer commented: “The Commission has not lived up to its original intention of having a harmonised regulatory approach to nanomaterials. The ongoing delay in finalising an official decision on the definition of the term ‘nanomaterial’ only adds to the existing market uncertainty from a postponed revision of the REACH Annexes.”
Tatiana Santos Otero, EEB Senior Chemicals Policy Officer said: “The Commission promised six years ago to revise the REACH Annexes as the quickest and most comprehensive way of regulating nanomaterials. However, we are still waiting for an official proposal on the revision and the Commission has provided no explanation or justification for this unacceptable delay.”
David Azoulay, Senior Attorney for the Center for International Environmental Law added: “For almost 10 years, the Commission has argued that REACH is the cornerstone of nanomaterial governance. Over the past five years, it has used every possible trick to delay and avoid adapting that regulation to the specificities of nanomaterials despite regular calls for this from Member States, civil society, workers, and academics. Instead of defending the narrow interests of the chemical industry over the health of citizens and the quality of the environment, it is high time that the Commission acted in accordance with the EU treaties.”
For more information:
Honey Kohan, ECOS Communications Officer, firstname.lastname@example.org, 0032 2893 0864
David Azoulay, CIEL Senior Attorney, email@example.com, 0041 7875 78756
Philippa Nuttall Jones, EEB Communications Manager, firstname.lastname@example.org, 0032 4715 70181
 Reset Governance: Nanomaterials as a case study on negligence. Available at: http://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/NGO-position-paper_Dec2016_Reset-Governance_Nanomaterials.pdf
 The conference ‘Governance of Emerging Technologies: Nanotechnologies in the spotlight – State of emergence or state of emergency?’ takes place at ‘The Hotel’, in Brussels on Wednesday 7 December. It is organised by CIEL and ECOS, along with environmental consultancy, Öko-Institut. http://ecostandard.org/?p=3188.